In order to
apply CLT approach in language teaching, it is necessary to boost teachers to
use lots of communicative task such as role-play, game, simulation, debate,
interview, oral presentation which attracts students to speak. In this case,
Beale (2002, p. 8) believes that such activities play central part for the
students to interpret, forecast, define, match, argue, share, and repeat. In relation
to students performance, Burn and Joyce (1997, p. 48) concede that ‘the speaker
must also manage discrete elements such as turn taking, rephrasing, providing feedback
or redirecting therefore at the end of the conversation or any part of
utterances may comprehensibly be achieved’. Furthermore Carter and McCarthy
(1995) reveal that in teaching speaking one can apply several steps such as
‘preparation, practice, evaluation, and extension’. These steps in language
learning lead have a positive outcome for the students to experience in
language learning. According to Hiep (2007) applying CLT in the classroom may
be ‘uniform’. However, she contends that this uniformity can be different
depending on certain context and the purposes of activities.
One of
pedagogical principles of CLT is bringing real life situation into classroom.
Acording to Nunan (1989) (cited in Hiep, 2007) carrying out communicative
activities, which motivate learners to speak, present communicative based tasks
may be administered using ‘authentic material and task based’. Teachers may use
several steps to implement CLT such as getting to know their students and their
needs, using visuals to support their instruction, modeling tasks before asking
learners to do them, bringing authentic materials to the classroom, and fostering
a safe classroom environment (Florez
and Burt, 2001). There are many authentic materials which can be applied in
communicative activities for instance teacher may ask the students to perform
drama or role play based on a hotel scenario or in a restaurant situation so students
can act as a customer and the other as a receptionist. In this role the teacher
just gives guidance on how to order menus, find hotel or book a room. By using
authentic language, students will acquire about a greater language learning and
broader cultural perspective about target language.
In the beginning
of the class, teachers should encourage students to speak in the classroom.
Teachers may give a warming up activity such as asking about the students’
weekend. Students may be asked to give a summary of which they have read and
then give an oral report. Whereas the students can listen and ask a question
about the topic.
Teachers also
may introduce interesting topics dealing with daily activities, hobbies,
favorite music, sports, and movies. As a class monitor, the teacher will watch the
students’ activities and give feedback at the end of the class dealing with
grammatical errors, wrong pronunciation, and words diction.
Conclusion
In conclusion, teaching
foreign language needs to implement appropriate approach. CLT is recognized as an approach rather than method.
In order to apply communicative or CLT approach, teachers may adapt some
pedagogical activities such as ‘solving problem, asking favors, expressing
feeling’ Yoon (2004). In speaking activities, grammar occupies an important
position. However, less attention is given in communicative activities.
Replacing grammar in communicative approach will narrow down the grammatical
accuracy of the students in writing and speaking. In order to solve this
problem, teachers may design their own strategy such as integrating micro
(grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary and macro skills (listening and
speaking) to develop communicative competence.
References
Beale, J. (2002). Is
Communicative Language Teaching a Thing of the Past?. [Online] http://www.jasonbeale.com/essaypages/clt_essay.html
[August, 23 2008]
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles
of Language Learning and Teaching (4th Ed.): Toward a Principled
Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education
Burn, A., & Joyce, H., 1997. Focus on Speaking National
Center for English Language Teaching and Research. [Online] (http://www.
nceltr. mq. edu. Av/ Focuspe. Htm [October, 03 2008]
Carter, M. & McCarthy. 1995. Grammar
and Spoken Language: Analysis for Language Teachers. Applied Linguistic 16 (2), 141-158
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Farrel
Thomas, S.C., & Jacobs G.M. (2003). Understanding
and implementing the CLT Paradigm. [Online] http://rel.Sagepub.com [August, 28 2008]
Hiep, P.H. (2007). Communicative
Language Teaching: Unity within diversity. [Online] http://www.fds.oup.com/pdf/eltcatalogue/0-19-442159-7-a.pdf [August, 29 2008]
Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the Lexical Approach:
Putting Theory into Practice [On line] http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESl-EJ/ej09/r10.html
[Sebtember,15 2008]
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching & Learning. Boston:
Heinle &Heinle
Florez, M.C, and Burt, W (2001). Beginning
to Work with Adult English Language Learners: Some Considerations. [On
line] http://www.marshalladulteducation.org/pdf/briefs/Beginning%20to%20Work%20with%20Adult%20English%20Language%20Learners.pdf [September, 15 2008]
Yoon K.E (2004). CLT Theories
and Practices in EFL Curricula: A
Case Study of Korea [Online] http://www.asian.-efl-journal.com/september_04_yke.php
[August, 23 2008]
Comments
Post a Comment